Showing posts with label Soviet Union. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soviet Union. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Monday, January 1, 2018
“Gulag Archipelago”: Exposing the anticommunist fabrications of Solzhenitsyn
By Nikos Mottas*.
One
of the most famous and celebrated works of Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, the
“Gulag Archipelago”, has been for a long time a kind of “holy
bible” for every anticommunist. Firstly published in 1973, it-
supposedly- consists an analytical record of the conditions existed
in the so-called “labour camps” of the Soviet Union. Within the
framework of the slanderous anticommunist campaign, bourgeois
historiography has extensively promoted Solzhenitsyn's work as a
source of arguments about the so-called “Stalinist dictatorship”
and “communist crimes” in the Soviet Union.
However,
there is a fundamental problem in the work of the deeply reactionary
Solzhenitsyn: Gulag Archipelago is a completely antiscientific book,
based almost entirely in rumors, speculations, third party opinions
as well as interpretations of opinions by Solzenitsyn himself! In
other words, the reader of this book becomes “hostage” of a novel
type, unverifiable, recording to alleged events by Solzenitsyn and
others who supposedly “saw”, “heard” or “learned”
something.
Monday, December 11, 2017
When Donald Trump Falsifies History
A response to U.S. President Trump's blatant falsification of historical events.
By Nikos Mottas.
Donald Trump seems to have his own version of history. A version that falsifies completely the real historical events. The tycoon- turned President of the USA- decided to demonstrate his ignorance (or, perhaps, ability to distort history) during a Republican Party's rally in Pensacola, Florida on December 8th.
What did Trump say? Among others, the U.S. President said the following: “We are the nation that dug out the Panama Canal, won two world wars, put a man on the moon and brought communism to its knees".
Sunday, November 19, 2017
Russian Communist Workers Party (RCWP): Life itself has proved the correctness of Marxism’s founders
Contribution by the Russian Communist Workers Party at the 19th International Meeting of Communist and Workers Parties that took place in Leningrad (St Petersburg), 2-4 November 2017.
By Viktor Tyulkin.
1st-Secretary of Russian Communist Workers Party Central Committee.
Dear comrades, let me greet all participants of the meeting!
27 years ago (in April 1990) I gave a speech at the conference of Leningrad CPSU organization that was to discuss the list of delegates to be sent to the XXVIII Congress of CPSU. Exactly then there took place the division between market oriented supporters of Gorbachev and orthodox communists. This division is still present in Russian Federation and manifests itself as the existence of two parties: CPRF and RCWP and the struggle between these two parties.
Thursday, August 17, 2017
KKE speech in Leningrad Conference: Our future isn't capitalism, it is the new world, socialism
Speech of the Communist Party of Greece at the the International Theoretical Conference of Communist and Workers parties: "100 years after the Great October Socialist Revolution, the lessons and tasks for the contemporary communists." (Leningrad, Russia 11-13/8/2017).
Dear comrades,
On behalf of the CC of the KKE, we thank the RWCP for this initiative and for hosting our Conference Today.
The Central Committee of the KKE honours the 100th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution. It honours the climactic world-historic event of the 20th century which demonstrated that capitalism is not invincible, that we can construct a superior organization of society, without the exploitation of man by man.
Sunday, August 13, 2017
Communist Party of Italy - Contribution to the scientific conference in honor of the 100 years since the October Revolution
Communist Party of Italy.
Leningrad, August 10-13, 2017.
A hundred years ago scientific socialism became reality. Until then, Marxism had only been theorized within the First International and applied to the class struggle in conditions of bourgeois domination; after that, it became reality for a short while, during the Paris Commune, showing that the proletarian revolution was not only possible, but even necessary. With the October Revolution, Marxism is applied to building Socialism, as the first step in the construction of the Communist society.
Sunday, July 23, 2017
The Revision of the Great October on the 20th and 22th Congress of the CPSU
By
Gyula Thürmer*.
Source: International
Communist Review,
Issue 7, 2017.
Hundred
years have passed since the Great October Socialist Revolution
triumphed on the 7th of November 1917. The Hungarian Workers' Party
celebrates the Great October as an outstanding event of the universal
history, an event that had a decisive influence on the world, the
international workers' movement, and also on Hungary and the fate of
the Hungarian workers and toiling masses.
Monday, July 17, 2017
“Achievements and successes of the working class in socialism”, presented by the KKE in Athens
Τhe
work “Achievements and successes of the working class in
socialism”, published by “Synchroni Epochi”, was presented by
the KKE's Central Committee, on July 12th
in Egaleo, Athens.
“Our
future isn't capitalism. It is the new world, socialism”! This
slogan was shouted by hundreds of members and friends of the KKE and
KNE at “Alexis Minotis” municipal theatre of Egaleo, where the
publication was presented. Working people from various sectors, who
live the intensive capitalist exploitation, listened with interest
the significant information that the new publication contains and
which proves the superiority of the socialist system. The
publication- a result of a collective effort by the Central
Committee's department for Labor and Trade Union work- consists part
of the KKE's greater multiform activity for the 100th
anniversary of the October Socialist Revolution .
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
Joseph Stalin is the "most outstanding" world figure according to the Russian people
Despite years of severe anticommunist-antisoviet bourgeois propaganda, a significant number of the Russian people express admiration and respect for the great Bolshevik leader.
Source: Russia Today.
Soviet leader Joseph Stalin has once again been named the most oustanding world figure by Russians. Vladimir Putin shared second place with poet Alexander Pushkin. Among non-Russians, Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton made the top 20.
Stalin, Putin, Pushkin, and Vladimir Lenin took the top three positions in a Levada Center poll which asked Russians to name the “most outstanding people of all times and peoples.” The poll results were published on Monday.
The poll surveyed 1,600 people in 137 places across Russia and was in free form – respondents weren’t given any suggestions for answers.
Saturday, May 6, 2017
Internationalist event on May 7 in Berlin: 72 years after the Great Antifascist Victory of the Peoples
An important internationalist event is being organized by the European Communist Initiative in Berlin on Sunday 7/5, with as its theme:
«May 9, 72 years after the Great Antifascist Victory of the Peoples: We are inspired and continue the struggle against the distortion of history by the EU-capital. For the overthrow of the system that creates crises, wars, fascism.”
The event is supported by the Party Organization of the KKE in Germany and Party Organization of the CP of Turkey in Germany. The programme of the event will include interventions from the representatives of the CPs that participate in the “Initiative” and a concert with songs of the Red Army and other revolutionary songs.
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Joseph Stalin's popularity among Russians continues to increase, reaching 16-year high
Sixty-four years after the death of Joseph Stalin, the popularity of the great Soviet leader in Russia continues to increase, reaching a 16-year high.
More specifically, according to a recent survey by the independent Levada Center, the percentage of Russians who have a positive perception for the communist leader has been increased. Some 46 percent of respondents viewed Stalin positively, compared with 21 percent who said that they hated or feared the former leader. Another 22 percent described themselves as merely “indifferent.”
More specifically, according to a recent survey by the independent Levada Center, the percentage of Russians who have a positive perception for the communist leader has been increased. Some 46 percent of respondents viewed Stalin positively, compared with 21 percent who said that they hated or feared the former leader. Another 22 percent described themselves as merely “indifferent.”
Most Russians — 32 percent — said that they looked upon Joseph Stalin “with respect.” Ten percent said that they had “sympathetic views,” while four percent said that they looked upon the leader with “admiration.”
Friday, January 27, 2017
Trotsky’s Lies - What They Are, and What They Mean
Trotsky’s Lies - What They Are, and What They Mean
By Grover Furr*.
The personality and the writings of Leon Trotsky have long been a rallying point for
anticommunists throughout the world. But during the 1930s Trotsky deliberately lied in
his writings about Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union. My new book, Trotsky’s
‘Amalgams’, discusses some of Trotsky’s lies that have fooled people, and demoralized
honest communists, for decades.
In January 1980 the Trotsky Archive at Harvard University was opened to researchers.
Within a few days Pierre Broué, the foremost Trotskyist historian of his time, discovered
that Trotsky had lied.
Trotsky had always denied that any clandestine “bloc of oppositionists” including
Trotskyists, existed in the Soviet Union. Trotsky called this an “amalgam,” meaning a
fabrication by Stalin. This “bloc” was the main focus of the second and third Moscow
Trials of January 1937 and March 1938. Broué showed, from letters in the Trotsky
Archive by Trotsky and by his son Leon Sedov, that the bloc did exist.
Friday, December 23, 2016
USSR 1991 – History did not end with the counterrevolution; Socialism is timely and necessary
It
was December 26, 1991 – 25 years ago- when the red flag with the
sickle and hammer was lowered from the Moscow Kremlin. It was then,
during the cold days of December, when the first socialist state of
the world, the homeland of the world's proletariat, bent under the
weight of the counterrevolution. Four days before, on December 22nd,
the leaderships of three of the largest Soviet republics had decided
the dissolution of the USSR, while the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union had been outlawed on summer of the same year.
The
events of December 1991 sealed the victory of the counterrevolution,
as the result of a process which officially began in 1985 with the
Perestroika and reached its peak in 1989 with the overthrow of
Socialism. Of course, the roots of the counterrevolution can be
traced back in a series of revisionist-opportunist decisions taken at
the CPSU's 20th Congress back in 1956.
KKE’s perception on socialism: Assessments and conclusions on socialist construction during the 20th century, focusing on the USSR
The following is the Resolution of the 18th Congress of the KKE (held on February 2009), containing assessments and conclusions on socialist construction during the 20th century, focusing on the USSR.
The 18th Congress of KKE, fulfilling the task set forward by the 17th Congress four years ago, dwelled deeper into the causes of the victory of the counterrevolution and of capitalist restoration. This has been an imperative and timely obligation for our Party, as it is for every Communist Party. It was thus that we faced this task during all the years that have elapsed since the 14th Congress and the National Conference of 1995. It is a task interlinked with the revival of consciousness and of faith in socialism.
For more than a century now, bourgeois polemics against the communist movement, often assuming the form of an intellectual elitism, concentrate their fire on the revolutionary core of the workers’ movement; they struggle, in general, against the necessity of revolution and its political offspring, the dictatorship of the proletariat that is the revolutionary working class power. In particular, they fight against the outcome of the first victorious revolution, of the October Revolution in Russia, fiercely opposing every phase where the Revolution exposed and repelled counterrevolutionary activities and opportunist barriers, which, in the final analysis, were weakening, directly or indirectly, the Revolution at a social and political level.
Monday, September 5, 2016
Why Socialism is superior to Capitalism- The achievements of Socialist construction in the Soviet Union
Why Socialism is far superior than Capitalism: The achievements of Socialist construction in the Soviet Union
By Nikos Mottas.
During
the last 25 years, after the victory of the counterrevolutionary
forces in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, the public political
discussion has been dominated by the concept of the “end of
history, end of ideologies”. This is certainly a very convenient
concept for the dominant class, the bourgeoisie, in her effort to
convince the world that: 1) Socialism has irreversibly failed, 2)
Capitalism is the final winner in the succession of History's
socio-economic transformations, 3) Every argument for a
non-capitalist society, where the means of productions will be
socialized in a centrally-planned economy, is “unrealistic” and a
“utopian fantasy”.
Anticommunism,
of course, consists a core part of the above bourgeois principle. For
more than two decades, the bourgeois forces and their mechanisms
(historiography, media, etc.) in all over the world have unleashed an
anticommunist crusade, mainly through demonizing and slundering the
Soviet Union and the socialist construction of the 20th
century in general.
Thursday, August 18, 2016
Nostalgia for the USSR- People in former Soviet republics say life was better in Socialism
A
new survey, conducted by Russian Public Opinion Research Center
(VCIOM), M-Vector, Ipsos, Expert Fikri and Qafqaz in 11
countries of the former Soviet Union, at the request
of Sputnik news agency and radio, shows
that the residents of 9 out of 11 surveyed former Soviet countries
aged over 35 believe that life in the USSR was better than it has
been since the breakup of the Soviet Union.
Also read: Life was better under Communism" says the majority of Russians, Romanians and Eastern Germans.
MOSCOW (sputniknews.com) -
Some 64% of respondents in Russia who lived in Soviet
times believe that the quality of life in the Soviet Union
was better. About 60% of respondents in Ukraine agreed
with this statement. The
survey showed
that the highest rates of agreement with this statement are
found among respondents in Armenia (71%) and Azerbaijan
(69%). Those respondents who do not remember living in the USSR,
those aged 18-24, believe that life has improved since the
collapse. Some 63% of young people in Russia think so.
Thursday, July 21, 2016
The Truth about the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the Imperialist Propaganda
By Nikos Mottas.
"If
we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and if Russia
is winning we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as
many as possible...”
- Harry
Truman, 1941.
Since
the end of the Second World War, the bourgeois historiography has
tried to distort various incidents in order to vilify Socialism and
the USSR. One of these incidents- which has been a "banner" of
imperialism's apologists and other anticommunists- is the so-called
“Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact”* which was signed in 1939. In it's
unscientific, unhistorical effort to equate Communism with Nazism,
the bourgeois propaganda presents the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact as a
medium of expansive policy by the USSR and Hitler's Germany. The
distortion of historical events, the amalgamation of lies and the
half-truths by the Imperialists and their collaborators aim in
defaming the huge role of the Soviet Union in the anti-fascist
struggle of WW2.
However,
the reality is different than the one presented by the bourgeois
historiography. Here, we will examine the circumstances and the
events which led to the Molotov-Ribbentrop non-aggression pact, in an
effort to debunk the anti-communist propaganda on this matter.
Saturday, July 9, 2016
Aleka Papariga- The importance of the critical assessment of the socialist construction in the 20th century
The
importance of the critical assessment of the socialist construction
in the 20th century for the strengthening of the labor movement and
for an effective counter-attack.
By Aleka Papariga*.
Source: International Communist Review, Issue 2, July 2014.
When we made public the subject of our 18th
Congress, which, besides the mandatory overview of our work, included
as a special subject our conclusions from socialist construction,
several friends of the Party wondered whether it was advisable, under
the current conditions and while the signs of the economic capitalist
crisis had already become visible in the international scene, to
focus on such an important issue which, in their opinion, might not
have been at the top of the agenda.
It is not necessary, of course, to remind the
reaction raised in the bourgeois press, the ironic and bitter
comments of well-known journalists, who were annoyed by our decision
to deal with this issue as they knew beforehand why we took such a
decision. Their reaction is quite understandable from their point of
view; they have a sharp instinct, they catch everything that can give
strength and dynamic to the revolutionary movement.
From the very first moment that we realized
that the infamous course of perestroika was nothing else but the
beginning of the counterrevolution and the temporary defeat of the
socialist system, we understood that we had to bear the brunt of
giving answers to all progressive people –and to ourselves as well-
who were reasonably wondering what happened. Even more so, since it
was proved that we were not at all prepared for such a tragic
development; we had not anticipated it and, unfortunately, we did not
have the appropriate reflexes in order to react, even just before the
lowering of the red flag from the Kremlin.
Saturday, July 2, 2016
Grover Furr- Evidence of Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan (Part II)
Grover Furr- Evidence of Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan (Part II). Continue from Part I.
Source: Cultural Logic, 2009.
Objectivity
And Persuasion.
Political
prejudice still predominates in the study of Soviet history.
Conclusions that contradict the dominant paradigm are routinely
dismissed as the result of bias or incompetence. Conclusions that
cast doubt upon accusations against Stalin or whose implications tend
to make him look either “good” or even less “evil” than the
predominant paradigm holds him to have been, are called “Stalinist.”
Any objective study of the evidence now available is bound to be
called “Stalinist” simply because it reaches conclusions that are
politically unacceptable to those who have a strong political bias,
be it anticommunist generally or Trotskyist specifically. The aim of
the present study is to examine the allegations made in the USSR
during the 1930s that Leon Trotsky collaborated with Germany and
Japan against the USSR in the light of the evidence now available.
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Grover Furr- Evidence of Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan (Part I)
Grover Furr- Evidence of Leon Trotsky’s Collaboration with Germany and Japan.
Source: Cultural Logic, 2009.
“If an objective
research project on the events of those years were to be done, free
of ideological dogmas, then a great deal could change in our attitude
towards those years and towards the personalities of that epoch. And
so it would be a “bomb” that would cause some problems. . . .”
Col. Viktor Alksnis,
2000.
“. . . it is essential
for historians to defend the foundation of their discipline: the
supremacy of evidence. If their texts are fictions, as in some sense
they are, being literary compositions, the raw material of these
fictions is verifiable fact. Whether the Nazi gas ovens existed or
not can be established by evidence. Because it has been so
established, those who deny their existence are not writing history,
whatever their narrative techniques.” – Eric Hobsbawm, 1994, p.
57.
“. . . we can demolish
a myth only insofar as it rests on propositions which can be shown to
be mistaken.” – ibid., p. 60.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)