 |
| Fascist National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir |
Adopted on the night of March 30, the law stipulates that capital punishment will be imposed on anyone who carries out a deadly attack “with the intent to deny the existence of the State of Israel.” In reality, however, the law is crafted in such a way that it overwhelmingly targets Palestinians.
The open enthusiasm surrounding the bill among sections of the Israeli ruling establishment only underscores its reactionary character. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir—a central architect and promoter of the measure—has repeatedly displayed a noose-shaped lapel pin and publicly referred to execution methods such as hanging and the electric chair. Such symbolism is not incidental; it reflects the normalization of extreme, state-sanctioned violence against Palestinians.
Against this backdrop, the Communist Party of Israel issued a clear and unequivocal denunciation: “Death penalty for Arabs law is a racist legislation that entrenches legal apartheid against Palestinians.”
This is not rhetorical exaggeration but a precise political characterization. The law does not merely introduce capital punishment—it codifies discrimination into the legal system itself, transforming the judiciary into an instrument of national oppression.
The parliamentary alliance Hadash–Ta’al reinforced this position in equally stark terms, declaring: “This law is not merely a punitive measure—it is an official declaration of the institutionalization of apartheid and racism, and the transformation of the legal system into yet another tool in the violent political repression of the Palestinian people.”
From a principled standpoint, the Communist Party of Israel and its allies reaffirm their total opposition to the death penalty under any circumstances. As they emphasize, the sanctity of human life is incompatible with state executions. Yet they stress that the present law represents something qualitatively worse:
“Based on the principle of the sanctity of life, Hadash–Ta’al opposes the death penalty under all circumstances and against any person, but more when it comes to selective, racist legislation that contradicts Israel’s obligations under international law.”
At the heart of their critique lies a fundamental political accusation: that the Israeli state is openly consolidating a dual legal regime structured along national and racial lines. As they warn: “By approving this bill, the government admits that the State of Israel operates two separate legal systems based on nationality and race: one that enables the execution of Arabs, and another that provides protection and immunity for Jewish criminals—this is apartheid at its clearest.”
This is not simply a legal development but a political watershed. The law exposes, in concentrated form, the class and national character of the Israeli state, where repression is not an exception but a governing principle when it comes to the Palestinian people.
In response, Hadash–Ta’al has announced that it will submit an urgent petition to the Supreme Court seeking the annulment of the law, signaling that the struggle against this measure will continue on both political and legal fronts.